Shariah Compliant Alternatives to collateral

  • 06 Mar 2013 08:21:55
  • France

Question

I bought sofa set in installment and once again it was written in the receipt that the sofas will remain the property of the shop until paid in full. I said you can’t do that. They said we have to write this otherwise we won’t be able to claim legally our money in case the customer fails to pay the installment. Anyway, I cancelled my transaction and paid him in full. Any other alternative to avoid this besides taking collateral?

Answer:

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

As-salāmu ‘alaykum wa-rahmatullāhi wa-barakātuh.

Your assertion was correct since the transaction in reference was not Shariah Compliant.

Hereunder are some Shariah Compliant alternatives:

1. Ijarah (Renting/Hiring)

Ijarah is a facility where the seller hires out the commodity to the client without the option of an eventual purchase. The client merely hires the commodity from the bank.

2. Ijarah Muntaqisah (Diminishing lease)

Diminishing Ijarah refers to a facility where one party leases out the commodity for a fixed tenure while the other party slowly purchases the leased item. For example, Zaid leases out a sofa set to Amr for 12 months on monthly installments. Amr also pays a monthly installment to purchase the sofa set from Zaid. Amr’s rental installments decreases according to his proportionate rate of ownership in the sofa set. There are a few intricacies involved in this procedure, if you are interested in this, you may contact us for a detailed explanation on this.

and Allah Ta'ala Knows Best

(Mawlana) Ismail Desai
Student: Darul Ifta

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this answer belong only to the author and do not in any way represent or reflect the views of any organizations to which he may be affiliated with. The opinions and educational information proffered in this communication are based on the jurisprudential understanding and available knowledge of the author. Given that contemporary issues and interpretations of contemporary issues are subjective in nature, another scholar may reach different juristic inferences and conclusions to those as expressed by the author. Whilst every effort has been taken to ensure total academic integrity and honesty, the author is open to corrective measures based on sound academics and juristic inferences. The Shari’ah ruling given herein is based specifically on the specific scenario in question. The author bears no responsibility towards any party that acts or does not act on this answer and is exempted from any and all forms of loss or damage. This answer may not be used as evidence in any court of law without prior written consent from the author. Any or all links provided in our emails, answers and articles are restricted to the specific material being cited. Such referencing should not be taken as an endorsement of other contents of that website.